Anand Panyarachun and the Making of Modern Thailand by long-time Bangkok journalist, Dominic Faulder is the first biography of the former prime minister in English. The outcome of six years of work, the book covers Anand’s life and work as diplomat, prime minister, company chairman, philanthropist and contributor to national and international reform. As the subtitle of the book indicates, Anand’s career also provides an useful lens through which to view the last half century of Thai history. The book includes interviews with many of the key actors in the events that have made modern Thailand. As Faulder notes, “The benefit of writing a book about Anand is that many people are willing to open their doors to talk about him; this kind of access is rare in Thailand.” Sadly, at least eight of those interviewed have since passed away – highlighting the timeliness of Faulder’s work.
Before going further, I should acknowledge that I do not come to this subject without my own experiences and biases. I covered Anand’s surprising nomination as prime minister in 1991 as Bangkok bureau chief for United Press International. A few years later I was part of the group that persuaded Anand to chair the non-profit Kenan Institute Asia and I served for a decade as executive director and later president of the Institute under Anand’s leadership. I later worked as part of a team of writers supervised by Anand that produced a book on King Bhumibol Adulyadej. I have been friends with Dominic Faulder for many years and more recently became friends with Nick Grossman.
Anand and I with former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in 1998.
Although I covered parts of Anand’s career and worked closely with him, Faulder’s book gave me new information and greater insight into Anand’s life and character. Faulder has given an accurate picture of a man of decisive rationality and integrity with high standards he set for himself and those working with him. As the book shows, Anand is a man of great self-confidence and quick decisions. More often than not, even in confusing circumstances, his judgment has been sound. Anand worked in a wide variety of roles in his career. He brought value and concern for the public good to each of them.
Elite has become a term of disparagement, but in many positive ways, Anand was elite. He did not suffer fools easily and was often straight-forward in exposing their foolishness. This is not the easy way to popularity. Although he certainly had enemies, Anand gained public support because most people could see his blunt assessments were intended to serve the public good. They also saw that he recognized the advantages his privileged upbringing had given him and sought to understand and empathize with the lives of ordinary Thais. He was elite without being elitist.
Yuangrat and I chat with Anand and UNC professor Jack Kasarda at a Kenan Institute Asia reception in 2015
Faulder gives a good account of Anand’s early life as a student in England and shows how his personal bonds with fellow overseas Thai students proved valuable in later years as Anand and his friends rose to positions of greater power. The background on Anand’s family and the particular importance of his father Sern is useful in understanding Anand. Sern, the son of a high-ranking official of Mon ancestry, won a King’s scholarship to study in England before being called back to Thailand to serve in the ministry of education, rising to take charge of all the royal schools, to serve as a professor at the Civil Service College and to become the top civil servant in the ministry. After the coup that overthrew the traditional monarchy in 1932, Sern became a businessman and publisher – precursors of his son’s later occupations.
It is hard to find fault with most of what Faulder has written. It is well-organized, carefully documented and, as far as I can tell, accurate. The faults I find lie in what is omitted, likely due to circumstances beyond the author’s control.
First of all, this is a biography that had both the advantages and the constraints of Anand’s full support and extensive cooperation. It gives little space to his critics and contains nothing embarrassing. It deals very carefully with Anand’s personal life; it is more about what he did than who he was. Faulder gives a brief account of Anand’s courtship and marriage to Mom Ratchawong Sodsee Chakrabandh, a fellow student in England and a descendant of King Mongkut. The book, however, says little about Anand’s long marriage, despite Faulder’s extensive access to Anand and his two daughters.
Similarly, the book fails to shed much light on Anand’s relationship with King Bhumibol Adulyadej. Faulder notes that Anand had numerous meetings with the king, especially during Anand’s two terms as prime minister. He quotes others about the relationship. One friend described Anand as a Bhumibolist rather than a royalist. However, there is little insight directly from Anand. As Faulder states in his author’s note, Anand made it clear that matters discussed privately with the king were off limits for the book. This is understandable, but unfortunate, as Anand’s views of the king could have contributed to a better understanding of a monarch whose long reign has been obscured by unfounded rumors, excessive adulation and excessive blame. Both the king and Anand had minds shaped by extensive early education in Europe that had to deal with the complexities of traditional Thai society. Their discussions of Thailand’s problems must have been interesting.
There is also little account of Anand’s religious thinking. Faulder notes his opposition to making Buddhism the state religion during the development of the 1997 constitution and quotes him as saying “normally I don’t give money to temples.” Since Buddhism is so important in the thinking of many Thais, it would have been useful to learn more.
Many of Anand’s views in the book were familiar from my chats with him at board meetings, dinners or social events, but some were new. For someone often described as part of the traditional elite, Anand’s views are rather untraditional. He rejects the idea of “Thainess” and laments that so many Thais misunderstand their own history – taking pride in the glory of a unitary state that never existed. He refutes the common prejudice of many in Bangkok against the Lao ethnic minority, saying he saw them as intelligent and hard-working. He says he appreciated the writings of Thai “radical thinkers,” including Jit Phumisak, Seni Sawaphong, Khamsing Srinawk and Seksan Prasertkul. He decries the abuses of Thailand’s Lese Majeste law and recommends its reform. As head of a commission on the troubles in Thailand’s far south, he goes against the views of most military and government leaders, recommending more local autonomy, greater respect for Islam and a bigger role for the Malay language as measures to reduce the violence there. At the same time he rejects the idea of a “network monarchy” popular among foreign academics. Faulder says Anand sees this network monarchy as “a convoluted, somewhat obsessive conspiracy theory.”
At 608 pages, Anand Panyarachun and the Making of Modern Thailand is comprehensive and detailed. It is an important step in addressing the lack of serious English language biographies of leading Thais, but it does more.
Using the life of a significant Thai leader, the book gives us insider accounts of many of the critical developments in recent Thai history. Anand’s career extended to diplomacy, government leadership, private enterprise, reform commissions and charitable work making him an important player in that history. But because the account is tied to Anand, it says little about the impact of change on the people of the countryside, the recurring radical movements, the rise and fall of the Thai communist party and much else. However, it does give us a better understanding of whatever events Anand touched and they were many. Anand and others contributed hundreds of hours of interviews to the book. This wealth of material provides an understanding of Thai diplomacy during the cold war and Thai efforts to adjust to the new reality after the wars in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. In particular there is an inside account of the fiasco of the Mayaguez incident and the contentious departure of US troops from the Thai perspective. The book describes Anand’s role in the Thai effort to readjust its relations with the communist governments in Vietnam and China – suffering the wrath of the conservative Thai military in the process.
The highlight of the book, however, is a detailed account of Anand’s two terms as prime minister. It describes his surprising appointment as prime minister after a military coup in 1991 and the confusing process that led to a second term after a public uprising against an unelected military leader the following year. Faulder sheds light on the relationship between Anand and army commander Gen. Suchinda Kraprayoon who appointed him only to see him move against military interests and sideline key generals.
He details the Anand government’s considerable achievements during those two brief terms. Quite correctly, a share of the credit is given to the ministers that Anand brought into his cabinet. With Anand’s support, those ministers advanced the rights of women, espoused much needed educational reform, improved the telecommunications infrastructure and made Thailand a model for enlightened action against AIDS, saving many thousands of lives.
There is a discussion of Anand’s work to help write Thailand’s 1997 constitution often described as the best of the many constitutions Thailand has had. His well-timed actions against the leaders of the 1991 coup kept Thai military leaders in their barracks and out of politics for nearly a decade.
Somewhat apart from Anand’s story, Faulder also provides inside accounts of publications about King Bhumibol and a long overdue dissection of a travesty of a royal biography, The Revolutionary King by William Stevenson.
Whether read for its insights into the life and work of an important Thai leader or for its account of recent Thai history, Anand Panyarachun and the Making of Modern Thailand is good value. Hopefully it will set the standard for biographies of other significant Thais that are long overdue.
0 Likes